Thread
-
Re: Pl/Tcl problem
Ian Harding <ianh@tpchd.org> — 2001-12-17T16:51:29Z
Oooooh. Harsh. I use tcl exclusively. I have not had any problem and am keeping up with the latest versions of PostgreSQL. <comedy_not_invitation_to_flame> Maybe hardly anyone who uses tcl runs RedHat? ;^) <\comedy_not_invitation_to_flame> Ian A. Harding Programmer/Analyst II Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department (253) 798-3549 mailto: iharding@tpchd.org >>> Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com> 12/15/01 09:17AM >>> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > But I'm not sure that this has anything to do with Alvaro's problem. > The bogus choice of soname has doubtless been that way for awhile, > and yet we've not had other complaints. Biggest reason: Hardly anyone uses tcl. We've shipped it that way, and there was one complaint month after we shipped... Comparing that to feedback on other areas in the same package, I just don't think the tcl functionality is used much. Tcl is exactly all the rage anymore. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
-
Re: Pl/Tcl problem
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> — 2001-12-17T17:19:40Z
> Oooooh. Harsh. I use tcl exclusively. I have not had any problem and am keeping up with the latest versions of PostgreSQL. > > <comedy_not_invitation_to_flame> > > Maybe hardly anyone who uses tcl runs RedHat? ;^) > > <\comedy_not_invitation_to_flame> If not Tcl/Tk, I was wondering what other scripting language people use to write X apps? Python? Perl/Tk? Hard to argue these are particularly better than Tcl/Tk, especially for small apps. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
-
Re: Pl/Tcl problem
Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com> — 2001-12-17T17:24:51Z
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Oooooh. Harsh. I use tcl exclusively. I have not had any problem and am keeping up with the latest versions of PostgreSQL. > > > > <comedy_not_invitation_to_flame> > > > > Maybe hardly anyone who uses tcl runs RedHat? ;^) > > > > <\comedy_not_invitation_to_flame> > > If not Tcl/Tk, I was wondering what other scripting language people use > to write X apps? Python? Perl/Tk? Hard to argue these are > particularly better than Tcl/Tk, especially for small apps. X? Python + glade is used a lot, Perl-GTK is also popular. Or you write it in C or C++ (kde). Perhaps even java. I haven't seen much use of tcl/tk for this in years. (FWIW, we had a few tcl/tk in Red Hat Linux a couple of years ago. All the ones we made are gone, and the ones in most apps as well) -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
-
Re: Pl/Tcl problem
Darren Ferguson <darren@crystalballinc.com> — 2001-12-17T18:10:35Z
It is everyone's choice and API. I use the pltcl because i use tcl when using aolserver. It is very good and i know a lot of other people who use the tcl api also. However i am not taking anything away from perl,python and the other languages because they are all good in their own way My 2 cents Darren Darren Ferguson Software Engineer Openband On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Oooooh. Harsh. I use tcl exclusively. I have not had any problem and am keeping up with the latest versions of PostgreSQL. > > > > <comedy_not_invitation_to_flame> > > > > Maybe hardly anyone who uses tcl runs RedHat? ;^) > > > > <\comedy_not_invitation_to_flame> > > If not Tcl/Tk, I was wondering what other scripting language people use > to write X apps? Python? Perl/Tk? Hard to argue these are > particularly better than Tcl/Tk, especially for small apps. > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue > + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) >
-
Re: Pl/Tcl problem
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> — 2001-12-17T19:00:27Z
On Monday 17 December 2001 12:24 pm, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > (FWIW, we had a few tcl/tk in Red Hat Linux a couple of years > ago. All the ones we made are gone, and the ones in most apps as well) The tcl/tk configuration apps.... Ugh. Well, in any case, there is a problem with the pl/tcl build. The /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh on RH 7.2 defines: # Base command to use for combining object files into a shared library: TCL_SHLIB_LD='gcc -pipe -shared -Wl,-soname,libtcl.so.0' So this is where it comes from. Now, why does it work with a non-RPM installation? A patch is in order --but to what? Hmmm..... -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
-
Re: Pl/Tcl problem
Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com> — 2001-12-17T19:06:26Z
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Monday 17 December 2001 12:24 pm, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > (FWIW, we had a few tcl/tk in Red Hat Linux a couple of years > > ago. All the ones we made are gone, and the ones in most apps as well) > > The tcl/tk configuration apps.... Ugh. > > Well, in any case, there is a problem with the pl/tcl build. The > /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh on RH 7.2 defines: > # Base command to use for combining object files into a shared library: > TCL_SHLIB_LD='gcc -pipe -shared -Wl,-soname,libtcl.so.0' That's for building libtcl. Not for building other libraries - they should obviously have a different soname. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
-
Re: Pl/Tcl problem
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@atentus.com> — 2001-12-22T02:15:58Z
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Monday 17 December 2001 12:24 pm, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > (FWIW, we had a few tcl/tk in Red Hat Linux a couple of years > > ago. All the ones we made are gone, and the ones in most apps as well) > > The tcl/tk configuration apps.... Ugh. > > Well, in any case, there is a problem with the pl/tcl build. The > /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh on RH 7.2 defines: > # Base command to use for combining object files into a shared library: > TCL_SHLIB_LD='gcc -pipe -shared -Wl,-soname,libtcl.so.0' > > So this is where it comes from. Now, why does it work with a non-RPM > installation? I compiled it on a non-RedHat installation and then copied the file. There was too much trouble involved in compiling directly in the RH server, so I used my own workstation instead. I don't know if it works compiling on RedHat. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]atentus.com>) "God is real, unless declared as int"