Re: 7.2 RPMs (Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Cc: <pgsql-ports@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-01-29T05:13:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- rpm-nls.patch (text/plain) patch
Lamar Owen writes: > Yes. I still haven't gotten a good answer as to a good development > environment for the java build. http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html might be a good place to start. > > * You're defining PGLIB in the bash profile. PGLIB doesn't do anything. > > As of? It's been unnecessary since 7.0. Beginning with 7.2 it's officially useless. > > Using `pidof postmaster` is wrong. There could be other postmasters > > running just fine. Should use the lock file, or not care because the > > postmaster or pg_ctl can handle this just fine. > > In this RPM incarnation there is the assumption that only one postmaster is > running. This will change once multiple config files are easier.... :-) But what's really wrong about it is that if the admin shuts down the "official" postgresql service, he inadvertently kills of all users' postmasters as well. > > * What happened to the contrib handling patch? > > * What is going to happen to NLS? > > It's going to be integrated, if I can remember to apply the patch you sent. > I would appreciate patches against the current release as opposed to your > personal development spec file. Got a point there. ;-) Updated NLS patch attached. I'll see about updating the contrib patch soon. Contrib isn't so important, but it'd be a shame to ship without NLS. TIA. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net