Re: timeout implementation issues
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-04-11T05:01:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart writes: > 1) All commands starting with "SET" must have the same transactional > semantics. I'll agree that it might be nice for consistancy, but imho is > not absolutely required. This rule is already violated anyway. SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION, SET CONSTRAINTS, SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION, and SET mostly_anything_else already behave quite differently. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net