Re: timeout implementation issues

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-04-11T05:01:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart writes:

> 1) All commands starting with "SET" must have the same transactional
> semantics. I'll agree that it might be nice for consistancy, but imho is
> not absolutely required.

This rule is already violated anyway.  SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION, SET
CONSTRAINTS, SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION, and SET mostly_anything_else
already behave quite differently.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net