Re: [HACKERS] Re: syslog logging setup broken?
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Cc: <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, <olly@lfix.co.uk>, <nferrier@tapsellferrier.co.uk>, <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-02-06T16:43:16Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii writes: > Moreover if postmaster detaches itself to be a deamon, nohup is not > necessary at all. Right. Scrap that thought then. > BTW, for the startup script, I don't think we need to use pg_ctl. > Invoking postmaster directry seems enough for me. The only reason for > using pg_ctl to start postmaster is waiting for postmaster up and > running. Waiting for the postmaster to start up is really only useful when you start it interactively, either during development, or if you need to repair a problem. In either of these cases you might as well (and probably rather should) look at the log output yourself, i.e., just use 'postmaster'. > In most cases the time to recover DB would not be so > long. And if the recovery took too long time, we would not want to be > blocked in the middle of the boot sequence anyway. Exactly. No waiting on startup by default then? -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/