Re: INDEX BUG???
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: gabriel <gabriel@workingnetsp.com.br>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-09-03T17:57:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
gabriel writes: > So my question is why in the first case the postgre did'nt use the index > and made a seq scan ?? Because it thinks the sequential scan will be faster. You didn't show any evidence to the contrary. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter