Re: INDEX BUG???

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: gabriel <gabriel@workingnetsp.com.br>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-09-03T17:57:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
gabriel writes:

> So my question is why in the first case the postgre did'nt use the index
> and made a seq scan ??

Because it thinks the sequential scan will be faster.  You didn't show any
evidence to the contrary.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter