Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql@rkirkpat.net>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, <pgsql-ports@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-12-21T17:29:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql@rkirkpat.net> writes:
> > INSERT INTO OID_TBL(f1) VALUES ('-1040');
> > ERROR:  oidin: error reading "-1040": value too large
>
> That's coming from a possibly-misguided error check that I put into
> oidin():
>
> 	unsigned long cvt;
> 	char	   *endptr;
>
> 	cvt = strtoul(s, &endptr, 10);
>
> 	...
>
> 	/*
> 	 * Cope with possibility that unsigned long is wider than Oid.
> 	 */
> 	result = (Oid) cvt;

        if (sizeof(unsigned long) > sizeof(Oid) && cvt > UINT_MAX)

> 	if ((unsigned long) result != cvt)
> 		elog(ERROR, "oidin: error reading \"%s\": value too large", s);
>
> On a 32-bit machine, -1040 converts to 4294966256, but on a 64-bit
> machine it converts to 2^64-1040, and the test is accordingly deciding
> that that value won't fit in an Oid.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/