Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Christof Petig <christof.petig@wtal.de>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-10-11T16:47:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes: > Christof Petig <christof.petig@wtal.de> writes: > > I would even propose 'idle (transaction open)' if you agree. (Seemed too > > long for me) > > No, the ps strings have got to be *short*. A lot of platforms have a > tight limit on how much command string ps will show. I thought 'trans' > was OK, though perhaps someone has an even better idea? Since nothing follows the status indicator in the ps display you can really make it as long as you want; the rest will be truncated. So you might want to put it "transaction (idle)", so that the essential information is first. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/