Re: PQprint
eisentrp@csis.gvsu.edu
From: eisentrp@csis.gvsu.edu
To: Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-07-03T14:33:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Chris Bitmead wrote: > What was the reason that PQprint was abandoned and psql went in its own > direction? The printing routines had to be rewritten, in particular to make them more modular. The options were to add a fourth(!) generation of printing routines to libpq and live with them until the end of days, or make them internal to psql and don't tell anyone when changes happen. If you want to use psql's printing routines you can just use print.c with no changes. I've made an effort to keep it independent of psql. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden