Re: Bug Repoprt- Casting Issues
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Dirk Elmendorf <delmendo@rackspace.com>, bugs@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-06-03T22:44:59Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane writes: > If you'd prefer not to be concerned about the intermediate conversion > to abstime, then use the date() notation. The :: notation is designed > for controlling the type conversion exactly. Wow, that is definitely confusing. I had always thought that `::' is "cast, no matter how", and date() is "call the function date, which happens to do the conversion". But now it seems that the supposed "cast" syntax is really just a dumb function call whereas the function syntax actually does more intelligent work behind the scenes. I have a feeling these type conversion issues aren't going away for a long time... -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden