Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question)
Roderick A. Anderson <raanders@tincan.org>
From: "Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@tincan.org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Poul Laust Christiansen <poulc@cs.auc.dk>, Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>, Ned Lilly <ned@greatbridge.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-01-23T20:57:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > In general, RPMs only work on systems that are the same as the one they > were built on, for various degrees of "same". If you're not picking up > the RPMs from your distributor or you're sure that the builder used the > same version as you have, it's always prudent to rebuild from the source > RPM. That should work, unless the package spec makes some unportable > assumptions, such as different file system layouts. But that is often > only an annoyance, not a real problem. While trying to get the FrontPage Extensions installed on a RedHat/Apache system I ran into to different version numbering systems between RedHat and Mandrake. Major pain. One called for perl 5.6.0-xxx and the other perl 5.60-xxx. After several hours of screwing around with it I took a break. Fortunately before I spent any more time on it the client I was going to do it for decided to not run them with Apache. I'm glad to see GreatBridge will be providing RPM's for many distributions. Though I do tend to re-compile from source I've found that those mdk's don't work too good with RHL. Rod --