Re: 4 billion record limit?
Martin A. Marques <martin@math.unl.edu.ar>
From: "Martin A. Marques" <martin@math.unl.edu.ar>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: Paul Caskey <paul@nmxs.com>, Postgres Users <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-07-28T10:36:50Z
Lists: pgsql-general, pgsql-novice
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > FWIW, I checked into MySQL, and as far as I can tell, they have nothing > > like this implicit 4 billion transactional "limit". So maybe competitive > > spirit will drive the postgres hackers to fix this problem sooner than > > later. ;-) > > We have *never* had a report of someone pushing this 4GB limit, and > theoretical problems usually go into the long-term development plan, not > in the "OHMYGODITSBROKEN" list. I'm not sure about MySQL not haveing the 4 Billion limit. As far as I know, Informix has (in it's 7.x versions) the 4 billion limit with the INTEGERS. Informix 9.x has added other data types, like an 8 byte INTEGER. Working on 64bit Solaris, but don't know which is the real limit. Maybe some day I'm make a small program to see if I can fill the column. ;-) Saludos... ;-) "And I'm happy, because you make me feel good, about me." - Melvin Udall ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martín Marqués email: martin@math.unl.edu.ar Santa Fe - Argentina http://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/ Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar -----------------------------------------------------------------