Thread

  1. So what happens at 2GB?

    Tim Perdue <perdue@raccoon.com> — 1999-03-12T23:35:17Z

    I'm told that my postgres table will automagically split when it hits 2GB,
    but I understand that code is not well tested.
    
    Do I need to worry at all when I hit 2GB?
    
    Thanks,
    
    Tim
    geocrawler
    
    
    
  2. Re: [SQL] So what happens at 2GB?

    Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> — 1999-03-12T23:56:55Z

    No.  It works properly.  I have had tables exceeding 10GB.
    
    --
    -- 
    Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) http://www.mcs.net/~karl
    I ain't even *authorized* to speak for anyone other than myself, so give
    up now on trying to associate my words with any particular organization.
    
    
    On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 05:35:17PM -0600, Tim Perdue wrote:
    > I'm told that my postgres table will automagically split when it hits 2GB,
    > but I understand that code is not well tested.
    > 
    > Do I need to worry at all when I hit 2GB?
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > 
    > Tim
    > geocrawler
    > 
    > 
    
    
  3. Re: [SQL] So what happens at 2GB?

    Brett W. McCoy <bmccoy@lan2wan.com> — 1999-03-13T18:11:23Z

    On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Karl Denninger wrote:
    
    > No.  It works properly.  I have had tables exceeding 10GB.
    
    How does it get past an operating system limitation on file size?
    
    Brett W. McCoy           
                                            http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy/
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    If you float on instinct alone, how can you calculate the buoyancy for
    the computed load?
    		-- Christopher Hodder-Williams
    
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
    Version: 3.12
    GAT dpu s:-- a C++++ UL++++$ P+ L+++ E W++ N+ o K- w--- O@ M@ !V PS+++
    PE Y+ PGP- t++ 5- X+ R+@ tv b+++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++ h+(---) r++ y++++
    ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
    
    
    
  4. Re: [SQL] So what happens at 2GB?

    Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> — 1999-03-13T20:17:39Z

    On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 01:11:23PM -0500, Brett W. McCoy wrote:
    > On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Karl Denninger wrote:
    > 
    > > No.  It works properly.  I have had tables exceeding 10GB.
    > 
    > How does it get past an operating system limitation on file size?
    > 
    > Brett W. McCoy           
    >                                         http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy/
    
    There isn't one on FreeBSD, but Postgres doesn't seem to know that.
    Instead, it breaks the table up into 2G-sized file chunks.
    
    --
    -- 
    Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) http://www.mcs.net/~karl
    I ain't even *authorized* to speak for anyone other than myself, so give
    up now on trying to associate my words with any particular organization.
    
    
  5. Re: [SQL] So what happens at 2GB?

    Brett W. McCoy <bmccoy@lan2wan.com> — 1999-03-13T20:30:43Z

    On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Karl Denninger wrote:
    
    > > > No.  It works properly.  I have had tables exceeding 10GB.
    > > 
    > > How does it get past an operating system limitation on file size?
    > > 
    > > Brett W. McCoy           
    > >                                         http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy/
    > 
    > There isn't one on FreeBSD, but Postgres doesn't seem to know that.
    > Instead, it breaks the table up into 2G-sized file chunks.
    
    It may do that for performance reasons, I would guess, or for
    compatibility with other operating systems that have the limitation (like
    Linux).
    
    Brett W. McCoy           
                                            http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy/
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    We are what we pretend to be.
    		-- Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
    
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
    Version: 3.12
    GAT dpu s:-- a C++++ UL++++$ P+ L+++ E W++ N+ o K- w--- O@ M@ !V PS+++
    PE Y+ PGP- t++ 5- X+ R+@ tv b+++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++ h+(---) r++ y++++
    ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------