Thread

  1. A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

    Robert Chalmers <robert@chalmers.com.au> — 1999-02-11T02:57:00Z

    Just wondering if there is a book specifically written around PgSQL, and if not, would anyone want one? You know, a thing like "A Guide To PgSQL". Not too heavy, maybe in parts. User + Advanced + ODBC ?
    
    What do you think?
    
    Robert
    
  2. Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

    Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 1999-02-11T03:04:51Z

    On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Robert Chalmers wrote:
    
    > Just wondering if there is a book specifically written around PgSQL,
    > and if not, would anyone want one? You know, a thing like "A Guide To
    > PgSQL". Not too heavy, maybe in parts. User + Advanced + ODBC ?
    > 
    > What do you think?
    
    I'd love to see a Nutshell book come out...:)  
    
    Marc G. Fournier                                
    Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
    primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 
    
    
    
  3. Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

    Clark C. Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com> — 1999-02-11T03:18:26Z

    The Hermit Hacker wrote:
    > 
    > On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Robert Chalmers wrote:
    > 
    > > Just wondering if there is a book specifically written around PgSQL,
    > > and if not, would anyone want one? You know, a thing like "A Guide To
    > > PgSQL". Not too heavy, maybe in parts. User + Advanced + ODBC ?
    > 
    > I'd love to see a Nutshell book come out...:)
    
    Ideally, it would be cool if the "books" for the "book" 
    was kept, so that many many people could contribute to
    it and then share in the proceeds, proportional to thier
    contribution.  This seems the most fair way to do it.
    
    If there is interest, I could be the third-party bookkeeper.
    
    I'm writing bookkeeping software built upon PostgreSQL.
    It'd be great to have a close-to-home-yet-real-world 
    collection of users.  
    
    :) Clark
    
    
  4. Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

    Kevin Heflin <kheflin@shreve.net> — 1999-02-11T03:32:06Z

    On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Robert Chalmers wrote:
    
    > Just wondering if there is a book specifically written around PgSQL,
    > and if not, would anyone want one? You know, a thing like "A Guide To
    > PgSQL". Not too heavy, maybe in parts. User + Advanced + ODBC ?
    > 
    > What do you think?
    
    I haven't seen such a book, but I sure would like one.
    
    Kevin
    
    
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    Kevin Heflin          | ShreveNet, Inc.      | Ph:318.222.2638 x103
    VP/Mac Tech           | 333 Texas St #619    | FAX:318.221.6612
    kheflin@shreve.net    | Shreveport, LA 71101 | http://www.shreve.net
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
  5. Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

    Bob Dusek <bobd@palaver.net> — 1999-02-11T07:35:01Z

    Amen.  A book would be really cool.  I would think that it would open up
    the PostgreSQL market a bit more, too.  A book on the shelf is 
    advertising.
    
    A new, good, recommended book is great advertising.
    
    Bob
    
    On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Robert Chalmers wrote:
    
    > Just wondering if there is a book specifically written around PgSQL, and if not, would anyone want one? You know, a thing like "A Guide To PgSQL". Not too heavy, maybe in parts. User + Advanced + ODBC ?
    > 
    > What do you think?
    > 
    > Robert
    > 
    
    
    
  6. Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

    Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net> — 1999-02-11T07:53:45Z

    On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Bob Dusek wrote:
    
    	The problem with writing a book on Postgres is that it's still
    being developed.  Before a book could be published, it'd be mostly
    obsolete.  I certainly would like the exercise of assembling one, but I
    really hate getting obsolete books.  This happened to me when I bought my
    first Java book.  I took it home and almost nothing in it worked.  :)  Of
    course, Postgres is changing in a compatible way, but the new stuff that's
    introduced *dramatically* changes the way people code.  pl/pgsql is a
    great example of this.  There's stuff that's done in pl/pgsql that
    previously had to be done C in a really complicated way, or you had to sit
    around wishing for.  This will change yet again when there's fk/pk
    constraints and such.  Chances are, there'll be a lot of neat stuff that
    will need to be included in a book before a book can be finished.  :)
    
    	I'm sure there's enough documentation lying around to make a
    decent book if we want to put it together.  Figuring out royalties could
    be kinda difficult.  :)
    
    // Amen.  A book would be really cool.  I would think that it would open up
    // the PostgreSQL market a bit more, too.  A book on the shelf is 
    // advertising.
    // 
    // A new, good, recommended book is great advertising.
    // 
    // Bob
    // 
    // On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Robert Chalmers wrote:
    // 
    // > Just wondering if there is a book specifically written around PgSQL, and if not, would anyone want one? You know, a thing like "A Guide To PgSQL". Not too heavy, maybe in parts. User + Advanced + ODBC ?
    // > 
    // > What do you think?
    // > 
    // > Robert
    // > 
    // 
    // 
    // 
    
    --
    Principal Member Technical Staff, beyond.com    The world is watching America,
    pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
    |    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE 
    L______________________________________________ and America is watching TV. __
    
    
    
  7. Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

    Adam Haberlach <haberlaa@ricochet.net> — 1999-02-11T08:20:01Z

    On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 11:53:45PM -0800, dustin sallings wrote:
    > On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Bob Dusek wrote:
    > 
    > 	I'm sure there's enough documentation lying around to make a
    > decent book if we want to put it together.  Figuring out royalties could
    > be kinda difficult.  :)
    
    	Agreed.  If anything, I would just polish up the online docs,
    publish them profesionally, and use the profits to fund development,
    pay for websites, or whatever.
    
    
    
  8. Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

    Rudy Gireyev <rgireyev@cnmnetwork.com> — 1999-02-11T08:31:33Z

    Since we are tossing ideas around, here is my two cents.
    .1c In order not to worry about royalties we can donate proceeds to 
    PostgreSQL.
    
    .1c There is stuff that changes and there is stuff that remains the same.  
    Installation, database creation, db administration, function creation etc ... are 
    pretty uniform so they can be covered in the "stay put" section. The stuff that 
    is more dynamic can be smacked in the "emerging technologies" section :-) 
    so that the reader can simply read up on that particular technology or buy a 
    whole new book.
    
    Rudy
    
    Date sent:      	Wed, 10 Feb 1999 23:53:45 -0800 (PST)
    From:           	dustin sallings <dustin@spy.net>
    To:             	Bob Dusek <bobd@palaver.net>
    Copies to:      	Robert Chalmers <robert@chalmers.com.au>, sql@chalmers.com.au,
           	pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org
    Subject:        	Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?
    
    > On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Bob Dusek wrote:
    > 
    > 	The problem with writing a book on Postgres is that it's still
    > being developed.  Before a book could be published, it'd be mostly
    > obsolete.  I certainly would like the exercise of assembling one, but I
    > really hate getting obsolete books.  This happened to me when I bought my
    > first Java book.  I took it home and almost nothing in it worked.  :)  Of
    > course, Postgres is changing in a compatible way, but the new stuff that's
    > introduced *dramatically* changes the way people code.  pl/pgsql is a
    > great example of this.  There's stuff that's done in pl/pgsql that
    > previously had to be done C in a really complicated way, or you had to sit
    > around wishing for.  This will change yet again when there's fk/pk
    > constraints and such.  Chances are, there'll be a lot of neat stuff that
    > will need to be included in a book before a book can be finished.  :)
    > 
    > 	I'm sure there's enough documentation lying around to make a
    > decent book if we want to put it together.  Figuring out royalties could
    > be kinda difficult.  :)
    > 
    > // Amen.  A book would be really cool.  I would think that it would open up
    > // the PostgreSQL market a bit more, too.  A book on the shelf is 
    > // advertising.
    > // 
    > // A new, good, recommended book is great advertising.
    > // 
    > // Bob
    > // 
    > // On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Robert Chalmers wrote:
    > // 
    > // > Just wondering if there is a book specifically written around PgSQL, and if not, would anyone want one? You know, a thing like "A Guide To PgSQL". Not too heavy, maybe in parts. User + Advanced + ODBC ?
    > // > 
    > // > What do you think?
    > // > 
    > // > Robert
    > // > 
    > // 
    > // 
    > // 
    > 
    > --
    > Principal Member Technical Staff, beyond.com    The world is watching America,
    > pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
    > |    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE 
    > L______________________________________________ and America is watching TV. __
    > 
    > 
    > 
    
    
    
    
  9. Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

    Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net> — 1999-02-11T08:55:38Z

    On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 rgireyev@cnmnetwork.com wrote:
    
    // Since we are tossing ideas around, here is my two cents.
    // .1c In order not to worry about royalties we can donate proceeds to 
    // PostgreSQL.
    
    	Does anyone on this list have any experience with putting a book
    together?  I've read O'Reilly's requirements and procedures, but that's
    about as far as I've gone.  It'd be a fun community effort I think.
    
    // .1c There is stuff that changes and there is stuff that remains the same.  
    // Installation, database creation, db administration, function creation etc ... are 
    // pretty uniform so they can be covered in the "stay put" section. The stuff that 
    // is more dynamic can be smacked in the "emerging technologies" section :-) 
    // so that the reader can simply read up on that particular technology or buy a 
    // whole new book.
    // 
    // Rudy
    // 
    // Date sent:      	Wed, 10 Feb 1999 23:53:45 -0800 (PST)
    // From:           	dustin sallings <dustin@spy.net>
    // To:             	Bob Dusek <bobd@palaver.net>
    // Copies to:      	Robert Chalmers <robert@chalmers.com.au>, sql@chalmers.com.au,
    //        	pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org
    // Subject:        	Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?
    // 
    // > On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Bob Dusek wrote:
    // > 
    // > 	The problem with writing a book on Postgres is that it's still
    // > being developed.  Before a book could be published, it'd be mostly
    // > obsolete.  I certainly would like the exercise of assembling one, but I
    // > really hate getting obsolete books.  This happened to me when I bought my
    // > first Java book.  I took it home and almost nothing in it worked.  :)  Of
    // > course, Postgres is changing in a compatible way, but the new stuff that's
    // > introduced *dramatically* changes the way people code.  pl/pgsql is a
    // > great example of this.  There's stuff that's done in pl/pgsql that
    // > previously had to be done C in a really complicated way, or you had to sit
    // > around wishing for.  This will change yet again when there's fk/pk
    // > constraints and such.  Chances are, there'll be a lot of neat stuff that
    // > will need to be included in a book before a book can be finished.  :)
    // > 
    // > 	I'm sure there's enough documentation lying around to make a
    // > decent book if we want to put it together.  Figuring out royalties could
    // > be kinda difficult.  :)
    // > 
    // > // Amen.  A book would be really cool.  I would think that it would open up
    // > // the PostgreSQL market a bit more, too.  A book on the shelf is 
    // > // advertising.
    // > // 
    // > // A new, good, recommended book is great advertising.
    // > // 
    // > // Bob
    // > // 
    // > // On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Robert Chalmers wrote:
    // > // 
    // > // > Just wondering if there is a book specifically written around PgSQL, and if not, would anyone want one? You know, a thing like "A Guide To PgSQL". Not too heavy, maybe in parts. User + Advanced + ODBC ?
    // > // > 
    // > // > What do you think?
    // > // > 
    // > // > Robert
    // > // > 
    // > // 
    // > // 
    // > // 
    // > 
    // > --
    // > Principal Member Technical Staff, beyond.com    The world is watching America,
    // > pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
    // > |    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE 
    // > L______________________________________________ and America is watching TV. __
    // > 
    // > 
    // > 
    // 
    // 
    // 
    // 
    
    --
    Principal Member Technical Staff, beyond.com    The world is watching America,
    pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
    |    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE 
    L______________________________________________ and America is watching TV. __
    
    
    
  10. Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

    Remigiusz Sokolowski <rems@gdansk.sprint.pl> — 1999-02-15T09:54:47Z

    > 
    > > Just wondering if there is a book specifically written around PgSQL,
    > > and if not, would anyone want one? You know, a thing like "A Guide To
    > > PgSQL". Not too heavy, maybe in parts. User + Advanced + ODBC ?
    > > 
    > > What do you think?
    > 
    > I'd love to see a Nutshell book come out...:)  
    
    Especially with a big number of examples to every (even most stupid)
    construction :-)
    	Rem
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------*------------
    Remigiusz Sokolowski      e-mail: rems@gdansk.sprint.pl           * *		
    -----------------------------------------------------------------*****----------