Thread

  1. Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

    Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> — 2011-02-12T21:50:24Z

    Oops, thank for remind !
    
    Oleg
    On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Tom Lane wrote:
    
    > Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
    >> btree_gist is essentially required for exclusion constraints to be
    >> useful in a practical way.
    >
    >> In fact, can you submit it for the next commitfest to be included in
    >> core? That would allow range types and exclusion constraints to be used
    >> out-of-the-box in 9.2.
    >
    >> Only if you think it's reasonable to put it in core, of course. If
    >> extensions are easy enough to install, maybe that's not really
    >> necessary.
    >
    > btree_gist is entirely unready to be included in core.
    > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-10/msg00104.php
    >
    > 			regards, tom lane
    >
    >
    
     	Regards,
     		Oleg
    _____________________________________________________________
    Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
    Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
    Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
    phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83