Re: Release cycle length
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-11-18T02:33:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier writes: > Right now, I believe we are looking at an April 1st beta, and a May 1st > related ... those are, as always, *tentative* dates that will become more > fine-tuned as those dates become nearer ... OK, here start the problems. Development already started, so April 1st is already 5 months development. Add 1 month because no one is willing to hold people to these dates. So that's 6 months. Then for 6 months of development, you need at least 2 months of beta. So we're already in the middle of July, everyone is on vacation, and we'll easily reach the 9 months -- instead of 6. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net