Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2003-03-20T16:03:57Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> True, but GUC seems like the way to go, and we have per-user/db settings
> for GUC.

But the required autocommit setting depends neither on the user nor the
database, it depends on the identity of the client application.  That type
of granularity is not offered by GUC.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net