Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-03-12T17:46:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dave Page writes: > Well what I *really* need has been made quite clear in other posts, but, > when I say resultset in the same sentence as pgAdmin, I'm referring to > the ability to enter an arbitrary SQL query, have the results displayed > in a grid, which can then be editted. To do this pgAdmin needs to be > able to figure out enough info about the source of the data to generate > the required insert/update/delete statements. Right. But since you can't really write a literal SQL statement that does an update that refers to a previous query, you are already doing a fair amount of internal magic anyway, so if the meta-data is determined by magic as well, that seems consistent. What you need is an updateable cursor on the server side. It has all the facilities you need, including standardized ways to find out the updatability metadata. Please concentrate on that and do not attempt to clutter the wire protocol with data that will not withstand a throrough investigation of semantics. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net