Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>, Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>, Brent Verner <brent@rcfile.org>, <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-04-18T00:21:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> I think Sean's idea is not to make it "just as easy as MySQL", it's to
> make it "the *same* as MySQL", for the benefit of those that refuse to
> learn differently.  Them as won't adjust to "\dt" in place of "show
> tables" aren't likely to adjust to "select * from tables" either.
> Not even (maybe especially not) if it's arguably a standard.

"Same as MySQL" is impossible.  We can pick here and there and add tons of
duplicate interfaces, play catch-up when they change them, but there's
always going to be a next feature that "would be *really* nice if
PostgreSQL could support it and it would surely draw *tons* of users to
PostgreSQL".  Freely written MySQL code is basically completely
incompatible with PostgreSQL, so someone who needs to switch will have to
relearn anyway.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net