Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>, Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>, Brent Verner <brent@rcfile.org>, <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-04-18T00:21:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes: > I think Sean's idea is not to make it "just as easy as MySQL", it's to > make it "the *same* as MySQL", for the benefit of those that refuse to > learn differently. Them as won't adjust to "\dt" in place of "show > tables" aren't likely to adjust to "select * from tables" either. > Not even (maybe especially not) if it's arguably a standard. "Same as MySQL" is impossible. We can pick here and there and add tons of duplicate interfaces, play catch-up when they change them, but there's always going to be a next feature that "would be *really* nice if PostgreSQL could support it and it would surely draw *tons* of users to PostgreSQL". Freely written MySQL code is basically completely incompatible with PostgreSQL, so someone who needs to switch will have to relearn anyway. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net