Thread

  1. 6.3 question...

    Cristian Gafton <gafton@redhat.com> — 1998-03-03T17:36:48Z

    Why was ecpg pulled out of the interfaces/Makefile ?
    
    Cristian
    --
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Cristian Gafton   --   gafton@redhat.com   --   Red Hat Software, Inc.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.
    
    
    
    
    
  2. Re: [HACKERS] 6.3 question...

    Michael Meskes <meskes@topsystem.de> — 1998-03-05T08:52:56Z

    Cristian Gafton writes:
    > 
    > Why was ecpg pulled out of the interfaces/Makefile ?
    > 
    > Cristian
    
    Huh? I didn't realize that! Was it intentionally left out? If so I'd like to
    know the reason. If it was unintentionally, please put it back in.
    
    Michael
    
    -- 
    Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager    | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
    meskes@topsystem.de                    | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
    meskes@debian.org                      | 52146 Wuerselen
    Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire!             | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
    Use Debian GNU/Linux!                  | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
    
    
  3. Re: [HACKERS] 6.3 question...

    Marc Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 1998-03-05T13:19:58Z

    On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Michael Meskes wrote:
    
    > Cristian Gafton writes:
    > > 
    > > Why was ecpg pulled out of the interfaces/Makefile ?
    > > 
    > > Cristian
    > 
    > Huh? I didn't realize that! Was it intentionally left out? If so I'd like to
    > know the reason. If it was unintentionally, please put it back in.
    
    	Its bounced in and out, actually...we removed it for awhile there
    because makes were failing miserably right there :(  I fear we must have
    forgotten to put it back in again before the release...
    
    	I've put it back in...those with CVSup access, can you please grab
    a new copy and make sure that it works for all of you?