Thread

1. Speed boost + Others

   PostgreSQL <postgres@linux.tpd.deuroconsult.ro> — 1998-02-02T22:12:16Z

   Hello everybody,
   
   Great job for 6.3! On my Linux box a nightmare interogation got down from
   15 seconds to 3 seconds.
   
   Bad surprize: The parser does not accept anymore field names like "valid"
   and "no". Will this be the normal behaviour from now on or just a
   misunderstanding?
   
   Costin Oproiu
   
   
   
   
   

2. Re: [HACKERS] Speed boost + Others

   Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> — 1998-02-02T22:33:02Z

   > 
   > Hello everybody,
   > 
   > Great job for 6.3! On my Linux box a nightmare interogation got down from
   > 15 seconds to 3 seconds.
   > 
   > Bad surprize: The parser does not accept anymore field names like "valid"
   > and "no". Will this be the normal behaviour from now on or just a
   > misunderstanding?
   > 
   > Costin Oproiu
   
   What was the old version, 6.2.1?
   
   -- 
   Bruce Momjian
   maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
   
   

3. Re: [HACKERS] Speed boost + Others

   Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 1998-02-03T00:47:40Z

   On Tue, 3 Feb 1998, PostgreSQL wrote:
   
   > Hello everybody,
   > 
   > Great job for 6.3! On my Linux box a nightmare interogation got down from
   > 15 seconds to 3 seconds.
   > 
   > Bad surprize: The parser does not accept anymore field names like "valid"
   > and "no". Will this be the normal behaviour from now on or just a
   > misunderstanding?
   
   	We've tighted down on use of 'reserved words' for field
   names...this is now 'normal behavior'
   
   Marc G. Fournier                                
   Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
   primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 
   
   
   

4. Re: [HACKERS] Speed boost + Others

   PostgreSQL <postgres@linux.tpd.deuroconsult.ro> — 1998-02-03T08:53:28Z

   
   On Mon, 2 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
   
   > > 
   > > Hello everybody,
   > > 
   > > Great job for 6.3! On my Linux box a nightmare interogation got down from
   > > 15 seconds to 3 seconds.
   > > 
   > > Bad surprize: The parser does not accept anymore field names like "valid"
   > > and "no". Will this be the normal behaviour from now on or just a
   > > misunderstanding?
   > > 
   > > Costin Oproiu
   > 
   > What was the old version, 6.2.1?
   
   	yep
   
   > 
   > -- 
   > Bruce Momjian
   > maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
   >