Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests

On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > 
> > JDBC works
> > postgres works
> > 
> > I is happy :)
> > [wasn't posted so I figure I'd post]
> > 
> > Runs very nicely under egcs-2.91.06 FWIW...
> > [about 3-5 times faster than before ... though that could be postgres
> > improvements - and probably is]
> 
> You said 3-5 TIMES faster?  Than 6.2.1, or last weeks source tree?  Can
> you give some figures.  I am curious.

unfortunately I can't give older times...  I could make current times
though if I knew how.  Postgres just _FLEW_ rebuilding the company
database *grin*.
This is Sunday CVS versus Friday CVS + egcs+haifa vs gcc-2.7.2.1

suspect it's an egcs thing mostly - though current postgres is faster than
6.2.1.

I've been following the CVS the entire time - except for about a 1 month
block ending last week :)

I'm just happy it's still up, operational, and fast :)
[egcs in the past usually crashed during the compile... and sometimes
produced unstable results.  so I used gcc-2.7.2.1 as a rule.  Just out of
curiousity I compiled using egcs+haifa which I'd just compiled+installed
and postgres ran beautifully :]
... No special command-line options though BTW.
And I've been glibc-2 since last march.

G'day, eh? :)
	- Teunis