Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report

jose' soares <sferac@bo.nettuno.it>

From: "Jose' Soares Da Silva" <sferac@bo.nettuno.it>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: David Hartwig <daveh@insightdist.com>, PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>, hackers postgres <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 1998-06-03T11:02:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, David Hartwig wrote:
> 
> > > O.S.: We choose Linux for his proved reliability.
> 
> 	*quiet snicker*
If I understand, this mean incredibility.
We are using Linux since 1994 and we are satisfied. ;-)
> > > 2.  As PostgreSQL doesn't allow an "ORDER BY" on columns not
> > > included in the target list of the "SELECT", (I know that it is
> > > SQL/92 standard, but IMO it's a fool thing), therefore, is not possible
> > > to  have the "dynaset "sorted for any field that is different from
> > > the key (in our case the useless OIDs).
> > >
> > 
> > This fix is in alpha and will be in the 6.4 release.  I do not know when
> > 6.4 is slated for release, but I am willing to send you a patch if it is
> > critical for you to proceed. 
> 
> 	6.4 is slated for Oct 1st...we had thought Sep 1st, except that,
> being the tail end of the summer, alot of ppl tend to be in limbo 
Thank you,
                                         Jose'