Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Arrays (inserting and removing)
neil d. quiogue <neil@iphil.net>
From: "neil d. quiogue" <neil@iphil.net>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, pgsql-questions@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1998-01-16T01:04:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > Major problem with OID: OIDs are sequenced across the database, > not the table. ie. tableA inserts with OID #1, tableB inserts with OID > #2, tableA inserts next record with OID #3, tableC then gets #4, etc... in my oo world (i.e., systems i develop), i use oid's to determine the type of object and due to the limitation of postgresql's oids, i use a separate field for the system's oid - kinda redundant but gotta live with it. nonetheless, postgresql's oids can still be improved. > And...# of OIDs is finite...so if you have a lot of tables with > alot of data in each...you run the risk of running out. finitely limited :) [---] Neil D. Quiogue <neil@iphil.net> IPhil Communications Network, Inc. Other: neil@postgresql.org