Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]
Bruce Tong <zztong@laxmi.ev.net>
From: Bruce Tong <zztong@laxmi.ev.net>
To: Richard Lynch <lynch@lscorp.com>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, M.Boekhold@et.tudelft.nl, James Olin Oden <joden@lee.k12.nc.us>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>, pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1998-07-24T12:42:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
> >> In fact, they are handled by SQL: CREATE DATABASE and DROP DATABASE. The
> >> createdb and destroydb tools just call these SQL statements....
> > Let's remove the "I don't want to think" utilities like
> >{create,destroy}{db,user} and force DBA's to actually use the *proper*
> >functions.
> While the man pages indicate that these invoke psql, and that a postmaster
> must be running, and somebody really smart could infer that that means that
> there is SQL to do the action, it would be much, much better if the man
> pages explicitly stated that it was merely a shortcut to using the sql.
I think only doing it the SQL way would be fine. Documentation would, of
course, have to cover it. I want, no need, to know what functionality
belongs to SQL and what belongs to PostgreSQL. I've certainly not got any
qualms about dropping into psql to do things. I like psql.
Bruce Tong | Got me an office; I'm there late at night.
Systems Programmer | Just send me e-mail, maybe I'll write.
Electronic Vision / FITNE |
zztong@laxmi.ev.net | -- Joe Walsh for the 21st Century