Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block

Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@docs.uu.se>

From: Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>
To: Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
Cc: Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2000-03-06T10:10:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Philip Warner wrote:

> >I don't see a problem with disallowing some DDL commands in a transaction
> >as long as they throw an error and the transaction aborts. 
> 
> Is it really necessary to abort the TX? Seems a little antisocial - can't
> you just return an error, and let the user/application decide if it needs
> to abort?

I'm afraid yes, it is necessary. Either the whole transaction or none of
it. Anything else is opening a can of worms that you can't control unless
you have a Ph.D. in fancy databases or something. (Incidentally, I know
that a non-zero amount of people around here have one of those, but that
won't help the rest of us much. :{ )

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden