Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@docs.uu.se>

View thread
From: Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org'" <pgsql-sql@postgreSQL.org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-02-29T16:38:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Don Baccus wrote:

> I vote for the SQL92 TEMPORARY.  Let's not add a keyword that is non-standard
> just because one or another commercial database makes use of it, unless
> there's some real functionality to be gained that's not covered by the
> standard.

The difference is that TEMP is already a keyword since 6.5 and we're
considering removing it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden