Re: pgindent run?
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-03-22T04:48:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > Hey, I am open to whatever people want to do. Just remember that we > > > accumulate lots of patches/development during the slow time before > > > development, and those patches become harder to apply. Peter E has some > > > already. > > > > Why not start a devel cycle by (a) branching the tree, (b) applying > > all held-over patches, and then (c) running pgindent? > > If people can get their patches in all at one time, that would work. > The only problem there is that people who supply patches against 7.1 > will not match the 7.2 tree, and we get those patches from people for > months. and those patches should only be applied to the v7.1 branch ... we are suggesting (or, at least, I am) is that you pgindent *HEAD* after we've branched off v7.1 ... ... that way, we go into the new dev cycle "clean", but we doon't mess up the *STABLE* tree ...