Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN

Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-10-09T23:38:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > > hrmm .. mvcc uses a timestamp, no?  is there no way of using that
> > > timestamp to determine which columns have/haven't been cleaned up
> > > following a crash?  maybe some way of marking a table as being in a 'drop
> > > column' mode, so that when it gets brought back up again, it is scan'd for
> > > any tuples older then that date?  
> > 
> > WAL would provide the framework to do something like that, but I still
> > say it'd be a bad idea.  What you're describing is
> > irrevocable-once-it-starts DROP COLUMN; there is no way to roll it back.
> > We're trying to get rid of statements that act that way, not add more.
> > 
> > I am not convinced that a 2x penalty for DROP COLUMN is such a huge
> > problem that we should give up all the normal safety features of SQL
> > in order to avoid it.  Seems to me that DROP COLUMN is only a big issue
> > during DB development, when you're usually working with relatively small
> > amounts of test data anyway.
> > 
> 
> Bingo!

you are jumping on your 'I agree/Bingo' much much too fast :)