Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's)

Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
Cc: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>, Ned Lilly <ned@greatbridge.com>, Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>, Ben Adida <ben@openforce.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>, pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Date: 2000-08-21T20:04:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Vince Vielhaber wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> 
> > At 10:48 AM 8/21/00 -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > 
> > >Could it be possible that folks are shying away because of having
> > >to install and learn an entire webserver and tools and then the 
> > >bug tracker on top of that?
> > 
> > Learning to use AOLserver is going to be harder than writing a
> > bugtracker and associated tools from scratch?  I find that hard to
> > believe.  
> 
> Learning how to use it is only a tiny part of it.  You still have to
> migrate your website to it.  It's not a drop in replacement.  So
> writing a bugtracker that will fit the environment vs learning a new
> webserver & migrating your website & rebuilding or rewriting custom
> apps ...  For the average, busy admin, don't count too heavily on the
> latter.  They're more likely to stick with what they know and trust
> regardless of how good something else is reported to be.

why not just run aolserver on a different port like we do?