Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's)
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
Cc: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>, Ned Lilly <ned@greatbridge.com>, Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>, Ben Adida <ben@openforce.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>, pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Date: 2000-08-21T20:04:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Don Baccus wrote: > > > At 10:48 AM 8/21/00 -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > >Could it be possible that folks are shying away because of having > > >to install and learn an entire webserver and tools and then the > > >bug tracker on top of that? > > > > Learning to use AOLserver is going to be harder than writing a > > bugtracker and associated tools from scratch? I find that hard to > > believe. > > Learning how to use it is only a tiny part of it. You still have to > migrate your website to it. It's not a drop in replacement. So > writing a bugtracker that will fit the environment vs learning a new > webserver & migrating your website & rebuilding or rewriting custom > apps ... For the average, busy admin, don't count too heavily on the > latter. They're more likely to stick with what they know and trust > regardless of how good something else is reported to be. why not just run aolserver on a different port like we do?