Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-06-20T22:50:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com> writes: > > At least on UNIX, couldn't you use a hard-link and change the name in > > pg_class immediately? Let the brain-dead operating systems use the > > vacuum method. > > Hmm ... maybe, but it doesn't seem worth the portability headache to > me. We do have an NT port that we don't want to break, and I don't > think RENAME TABLE is worth the trouble of testing/supporting two > implementations. > > Even on Unix, aren't there filesystems that don't do hard links? > Not that I'd recommend running Postgres on such a volume, but... tTo the best of my knowledge, its only symlinks that aren't (weren't?) universally supported ... somehow, I believe taht even extends to NT ...