Re: Big 7.1 open items
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-06-15T12:03:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Jan Wieck wrote: > Why not changing the naming to be something like this: > > <dbroot>/catalog_tables/pg_... > <dbroot>/catalog_index/pg_... > <dbroot>/user_tables/oid_... > <dbroot>/user_index/oid_... > <dbroot>/temp_tables/oid_... > <dbroot>/temp_index/oid_... > <dbroot>/toast_tables/oid_... > <dbroot>/toast_index/oid_... > <dbroot>/whatnot_???/... > > This way, it would be much easier to separate all the > different object types to different physical media. We would > loose some transparency, but I've allways wondered what > people USE that for (except for just wanna know). For > convinience we could implement another little utility that > tells the object size like Wow, I've been advocating this one for how many months now? :) You won't get any arguments from me ...