Thread

1. Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

   Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> — 2003-01-13T15:32:08Z

   
   > -----Original Message-----
   > From: Ross J. Reedstrom [mailto:reedstrm@rice.edu] 
   > Sent: 13 January 2003 15:16
   > To: Vince Vielhaber
   > Cc: Dan Langille; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
   > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
   > 
   > 
   > And there was a statement upthread from someone (Marc?) 
   > indicating that the bandwidth was down in the noise for them 
   > (as an ISP).
   
   I think that was Vince talking about 1 mirror. The January stats to date
   (bear in mind it didn't go live until the 4/5th Jan), for the Portal and
   idocs *only* (ie, not including gborg, techdocs, developer, user-lounge,
   archives, fts, pgadmin, odbc, jdbc or ftp) are:
   
   Total Hits 1339547 
   Total Files 1064536 
   Total Pages 324346 
   Total Visits 58178 
   Total KBytes 2712883
   
   In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days.
   
   I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-)
   
   Regards, Dave.
   
   

2. Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

   Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com> — 2003-01-13T15:42:16Z

   On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
   
   >
   >
   > > -----Original Message-----
   > > From: Ross J. Reedstrom [mailto:reedstrm@rice.edu]
   > > Sent: 13 January 2003 15:16
   > > To: Vince Vielhaber
   > > Cc: Dan Langille; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
   > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
   > >
   > >
   > > And there was a statement upthread from someone (Marc?)
   > > indicating that the bandwidth was down in the noise for them
   > > (as an ISP).
   >
   > I think that was Vince talking about 1 mirror. The January stats to date
   > (bear in mind it didn't go live until the 4/5th Jan), for the Portal and
   > idocs *only* (ie, not including gborg, techdocs, developer, user-lounge,
   > archives, fts, pgadmin, odbc, jdbc or ftp) are:
   >
   > Total Hits 1339547
   > Total Files 1064536
   > Total Pages 324346
   > Total Visits 58178
   > Total KBytes 2712883
   >
   > In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days.
   >
   > I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-)
   
   It's irrelevant.  The portal and idocs aren't being mirrored and the
   question was about mirrors.
   
   Vince.
   -- 
    Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond!  http://www.pop4.net/
      http://www.meanstreamradio.com       http://www.unknown-artists.com
            Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.
   
   
   

3. Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

   Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> — 2003-01-13T16:40:32Z

   -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
   Hash: SHA1
   NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
   
   
   > Go back and reread the end of it.  The first part was about the ads,
   > the second was about mirrors.
   
   Sorry for the confusion: Dave is right, I just asked the question wrong. 
   I am not really concerned about the mirrors, but how much traffic the 
   main portal endures, and if that number justifies the putting of 
   advertisements on the site.
   
   The answer to the first appears to be about 320 MB per day, or about 
   9 gigs per month. Not too shabby, but not too bad either. To be 
   totally fair, we should also factor in all the other sites (subdomains) 
   that hub.org is providing.
   
   I see the big questions as:
   
   What prompted the redesign to put the ads on every page of the site, 
   when before they were only on the opening "flags" page?
   
   
   How much monthly revenue do the ads bring in, and can we (the community) 
   provide an alternative to this income, perhaps via direct contributions?
   
   
   --
   Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
   PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200301131149
   
   -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
   Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
   
   iD8DBQE+Iu5+vJuQZxSWSsgRAjkSAJ9Yit8t0GIwigsdf5DZtDVA71vZCgCgz29S
   kgC4JGdxFigBpjaHH9KFnaA=
   =z1RC
   -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----