Thread
-
Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> — 1998-02-01T22:12:33Z
> > On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Peter T Mount wrote: > > > > > Has anyone seen the jdbc patch I posted earlier today? > > > > If not, I'll ftp it. > > I haven't seen it...send me a copy directly? The mailing lists > have '# of lines' limits to messages, which may have been where it got > lost... Wonder what the limit is? Let me find out by trial and error... :-) -- Bruce Momjian maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
-
Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 1998-02-01T22:26:01Z
On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Peter T Mount wrote: > > > > > > > > Has anyone seen the jdbc patch I posted earlier today? > > > > > > If not, I'll ftp it. > > > > I haven't seen it...send me a copy directly? The mailing lists > > have '# of lines' limits to messages, which may have been where it got > > lost... > > Wonder what the limit is? Let me find out by trial and error... :-) I just increased it...when we didn't have the patches list, I had increased hackers, but just switched it around: # maxlength [integer] (40000) <resend,digest> # The maximum size of an unapproved message in characters. When # used with digest, a new digest will be automatically generated if # the size of the digest exceeds this number of characters. maxlength = 4000000 Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org -
Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> — 1998-02-01T22:37:53Z
> I just increased it...when we didn't have the patches list, I had > increased hackers, but just switched it around: > > # maxlength [integer] (40000) <resend,digest> > # The maximum size of an unapproved message in characters. When > # used with digest, a new digest will be automatically generated if > # the size of the digest exceeds this number of characters. > maxlength = 4000000 Gee, that is taking all the fun out of finding the limit myself. :-) -- Bruce Momjian maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
-
Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 1998-02-01T23:29:59Z
On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I just increased it...when we didn't have the patches list, I had > > increased hackers, but just switched it around: > > > > # maxlength [integer] (40000) <resend,digest> > > # The maximum size of an unapproved message in characters. When > > # used with digest, a new digest will be automatically generated if > > # the size of the digest exceeds this number of characters. > > maxlength = 4000000 > > Gee, that is taking all the fun out of finding the limit myself. :-) I could add a random number generator to the code from 1->4000000 that changes each time an email is sent, just so that it became a game of (excuse Vadim) Russian Roulette? :) Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org