Re: [HACKERS] sorting big tables :(

On Thu, 21 May 1998, Oleg Broytmann wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> On Wed, 20 May 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > >   No, that doesn't happen.  The only way to eliminate fragmentation is a
> > > dump/newfs/restore cycle.  UFS does do fragmentation avoidance (which is
> > > reason UFS filesystems have a 10% reserve).
> > 
> > 	Okay, then we have two different understandings of this.  My
> > understanding was that the 10% reserve gave the OS a 'temp area' in which
> > to move blocks to/from so that it could defrag on the fly...
> 
>    No, you are wrong. This 10% is temp area reserved for emergent
> situations - when root bring system down to single-user and do system
> maintainance.

	Actually, in this one you are only partly right.  Only root has
*access* to using that extra 10%, but, as I've been corrected by several
ppl, including a couple on the FreeBSD list, that 10% is meant to
*prevent/reduce* fragmentation.