Thread

  1. Backend often crashing

    Guido Notari <gnotari@linkgroup.it> — 2003-02-20T14:53:14Z

    I have one of those nasty problems, with Postgres backend often crashing
    with signal 11.
    
    I'll do my best to give you the details:
    
    Postgres is 7.2.1, more exactly is Debian package 7.2.1-2 from the Stable
    (Woody) distribution -- I'm forwarding copy of this message to Debian's
    package mantainer.
    
    Postgres is running as a backend for a well known italian web site, running
    on Zope (version 2.6.1 with psycopg Python adapter, v.1.1)
    
    The problem is recent, i.e. never happened until last month or so, on this
    same setup.
    I have a few other machines, running the same software setup, but different
    Zope sites, never experiencing any problem.
    
    These are the relevant lines from syslog
    
    Feb 20 14:43:53 speed postgres[13365]: [25] DEBUG:  server process (pid
    15906) was terminated by signal 11
    Feb 20 14:43:53 speed postgres[13365]: [26] DEBUG:  terminating any other
    active server processes
    Feb 20 14:43:53 speed postgres[15908]: [26-1] NOTICE:  Message from
    PostgreSQL backend:
    Feb 20 14:43:53 speed postgres[15908]: [26-2] ^IThe Postmaster has informed
    me that some other backend
    Feb 20 14:43:53 speed postgres[15908]: [26-3] ^Idied abnormally and
    possibly corrupted shared memory.
    Feb 20 14:43:53 speed postgres[15908]: [26-4] ^II have rolled back the
    current transaction and am
    Feb 20 14:43:53 speed postgres[15908]: [26-5] ^Igoing to terminate your
    database system connection and exit.
    Feb 20 14:43:53 speed postgres[15908]: [26-6] ^IPlease reconnect to the
    database system and repeat your query.
    Feb 20 14:43:53 speed postgres[15904]: [26-1] NOTICE:  Message from
    PostgreSQL backend:
    Feb 20 14:43:53 speed postgres[15904]: [26-2] ^IThe Postmaster has informed
    me that some other backend
    Feb 20 14:43:53 speed postgres[15904]: [26-3] ^Idied abnormally and
    possibly corrupted shared memory.
    Feb 20 14:43:53 speed postgres[15904]: [26-4] ^II have rolled back the
    current transaction and am
    
    I immediately thought of an hardware problem but, having an equivalent
    machine online, I dumped the db and moved to that.
    The problem manifestated at once on the other machine, which had previously
    (~1 month before)  run the site without any error.
    
    The two machines have the same software setup, but different Linux kernels
    (2.4.19 vs 2.4.20, reiserfs vs ext3), and different hardware.
    
    I cannot reproduce the problem reliably, though on the production machine
    the database crashes many times an hour.
    
    It _seems_ to be related to some mildly convoluted query (a SELECT only
    query). Running that query manually, I managed to crash the backend only
    once.
    VACUUM FULL never gave any error, nor did pg_dump.
    
    I obtained some (pretty large, ~90MB) core files from the crashes. The
    backtrace is consistent between the files, here it is:
    
    #0  0x08157e92 in MemoryContextReset ()
    #1  0x08157eb9 in MemoryContextResetChildren ()
    #2  0x08157e8b in MemoryContextReset ()
    #3  0x08157eb9 in MemoryContextResetChildren ()
    #4  0x08157e8b in MemoryContextReset ()
    #5  0x080c5c88 in ExecScan ()
    #6  0x080cb61a in ExecSeqScan ()
    #7  0x080c4139 in ExecProcNode ()
    #8  0x080cbe2c in ExecSort ()
    #9  0x080c41c9 in ExecProcNode ()
    #10 0x080ca630 in ExecMergeJoin ()
    #11 0x080c4189 in ExecProcNode ()
    #12 0x080cbe2c in ExecSort ()
    #13 0x080c41c9 in ExecProcNode ()
    #14 0x080cc0ae in ExecUnique ()
    #15 0x080c41d9 in ExecProcNode ()
    #16 0x080cd5d5 in ExecReScanSetParamPlan ()
    #17 0x080c5cac in ExecScan ()
    #18 0x080cd5f6 in ExecSubqueryScan ()
    #19 0x080c4169 in ExecProcNode ()
    #20 0x080c73f8 in ExecProcAppend ()
    #21 0x080c4129 in ExecProcNode ()
    #22 0x080cbe2c in ExecSort ()
    #23 0x080c41c9 in ExecProcNode ()
    #24 0x080cb9a6 in ExecSetOp ()
    #25 0x080c41e9 in ExecProcNode ()
    #26 0x080cbe2c in ExecSort ()
    #27 0x080c41c9 in ExecProcNode ()
    #28 0x080c30fe in ExecutorEnd ()
    #29 0x080c2797 in ExecutorRun ()
    #30 0x081104de in ProcessQuery ()
    #31 0x0810ed70 in pg_exec_query_string ()
    #32 0x0810fd5e in PostgresMain ()
    #33 0x080f6d4e in ClosePostmasterPorts ()
    #34 0x080f669f in ClosePostmasterPorts ()
    #35 0x080f5882 in PostmasterMain ()
    #36 0x080f5391 in PostmasterMain ()
    #37 0x080d4e18 in main ()
    #38 0x401d114f in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
    
    Any hints are welcome.
    
    ciao
    Guido
    
    
    
    
    
  2. Re: Backend often crashing

    Jeff Ross <jross@openvistas.net> — 2003-02-20T20:49:05Z

    On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Guido Notari wrote:
    
    > I have one of those nasty problems, with Postgres backend often crashing
    > with signal 11.
    >
    [snip]
    
    > Any hints are welcome.
    >
    > ciao
    > Guido
    >
    I think signal 11 is almost always bad ram.  If you do a Google search,
    you'll see what I mean.
    
    If this is recent, maybe the ram just went bad.
    
    
    -- 
    Jeff Ross
    Open Vistas Networking, Inc.
    http://www.openvistas.net
    
    
    
  3. Re: Backend often crashing

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2003-02-20T21:07:59Z

    "Guido Notari" <gnotari@linkgroup.it> writes:
    > I have one of those nasty problems, with Postgres backend often crashing
    > with signal 11.
    
    My gut feeling after looking at the stack trace is that it's a
    memory-stomp kind of error (something writing on memory that doesn't
    belong to it --- probably a buffer overrun).
    
    One quick-and-dirty thing to try is updating to 7.2.4.  Neil fixed a few
    potential buffer overrun conditions in 7.2.2 and 7.2.4.  I don't have a
    lot of hope that this will eliminate the issue, but (a) it's easy to do
    and (b) you ought to be on 7.2.4 anyway on general principles.
    
    If that doesn't help then you'll need to either create a reproducible
    example so someone else can debug it, or work on debugging it yourself,
    or possibly let someone else have access to your machine to try to debug
    it for you.  A first step in either the second or third choices is to
    rebuild Postgres with --enable-debug so that you can get a more complete
    stack trace.
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
  4. Re: Backend often crashing

    Nigel J. Andrews <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk> — 2003-02-21T08:11:14Z

    On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jeff Ross wrote:
    
    > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Guido Notari wrote:
    > 
    > > I have one of those nasty problems, with Postgres backend often crashing
    > > with signal 11.
    > >
    > [snip]
    > 
    > > Any hints are welcome.
    > >
    > > ciao
    > > Guido
    > >
    > I think signal 11 is almost always bad ram.  If you do a Google search,
    > you'll see what I mean.
    > 
    > If this is recent, maybe the ram just went bad.
    
    My first thought until the statements about the second machine doing it as
    well.
    
    Have you considered the possibility that you are running into some sort of
    resource limit? It could be your machines have a hard memory usage limit (they
    are production machines after all). I don't think PostgreSQL would just die on
    a Sig11 for that. It should log messages about memory allocation
    failure. However, if your kernel is configured to do 'lazy' allocation it could
    be that it's only when the memory comes to be used that the fault
    happens. (Should that be a bus fault not a segmentation one though?)
    
    
    -- 
    Nigel J. Andrews
    
    
    
  5. Re: Backend often crashing

    Tony Grant <tony@tgds.net> — 2003-02-21T13:56:54Z

    On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 15:49, Jeff Ross wrote:
    > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Guido Notari wrote:
    > 
    > > I have one of those nasty problems, with Postgres backend often crashing
    > > with signal 11.
    > >
    > [snip]
    > 
    > > Any hints are welcome.
    > >
    > > ciao
    > > Guido
    > >
    > I think signal 11 is almost always bad ram.  If you do a Google search,
    > you'll see what I mean.
    
    Yes! this happened to me. Check your server hardware ASAP
    
    Cheers
    
    Tony Grant
    
    -- 
    www.tgds.net Library management software toolkit, 
    redhat linux on Sony Vaio C1XD, 
    Dreamweaver MX with Tomcat and PostgreSQL