Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
From: Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-patches@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2008-01-29T05:09:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Jeff Davis wrote: > I think that pg_dump is a reasonable use case for synchoronized scans > when the table has not been clustered. It could potentially make pg_dump > have much less of a performance impact when run against an active > system. > One of the advantages I see with maintaining table dump order is that rsyncing backups to remote locations will work better. Kris Jurka