Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>

From: Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-patches@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2008-01-29T05:09:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Jeff Davis wrote:

> I think that pg_dump is a reasonable use case for synchoronized scans
> when the table has not been clustered. It could potentially make pg_dump
> have much less of a performance impact when run against an active
> system.
>

One of the advantages I see with maintaining table dump order is that 
rsyncing backups to remote locations will work better.

Kris Jurka