Horton

Re: Transaction timeout

Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
To: "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: 邱宇航 <iamqyh@gmail.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, Andrey Borodin <amborodin86@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-12-08T07:59:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, 07 Dec 2023 at 20:40, Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>> On 7 Dec 2023, at 06:25, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  If idle_in_transaction_timeout is bigger than transaction_timeout,
>> the idle-in-transaction timeout don't needed, right?
> Yes, I think so.
>

Should we disable the idle_in_transaction_timeout in this case? Of cursor, I'm
not strongly insist on this.

I think you forget disable transaction_timeout in AutoVacWorkerMain().
If not, can you elaborate on why you don't disable it?

--
Regrads,
Japin Li
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.

Commits

  1. Add TAP tests for timeouts

  2. Remove flaky isolation tests for timeouts

  3. Followup fixes for transaction_timeout

  4. Introduce transaction_timeout

  5. On systems that have setsid(2) (which should be just about everything except