Re: Another incorrect comment for pg_stat_statements
Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
From: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-06-28T04:15:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- fix-comment-for-entry_reset.patch (text/x-diff) patch
- (unnamed) (text/plain)
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 11:22, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:53 AM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi, hackers >> >> There has $subject that introduced by commit 6b4d23feef6. When we reset >> the entries >> if all parameters are avaiable, non-top-level entries removed first, then >> top-level >> entries. > > > I did not see the diffs. Maybe uploaded the wrong attachment? > My bad! Here is the patch. Thanks!
Commits
-
pg_stat_statements: Fix second comment related to entry resets
- 7e8349cbd7f7 14.9 landed
- e886124647ce 15.4 landed
- bc8e9a6a25e1 16.0 landed
-
pg_stat_statements: Fix incorrect comment with entry resets
- aa4b11e8be7d 14.9 landed
- a757e16b7e7c 15.4 landed
- dc73db67433c 16.0 landed
-
Track identical top vs nested queries independently in pg_stat_statements
- 6b4d23feef6e 14.0 cited