Re: Typo about subxip in comments
Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
From: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers
<pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-11-13T15:02:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 at 12:12, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 2:45 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Maybe a wrong plural in XidInMvccSnapshot(). >> >> * Make a quick range check to eliminate most XIDs without looking at the >> * xip arrays. >> >> I think we should use "xip array" instead of "xip arrays". >> > > I think here the comment is referring to both xip and subxip array, so > it looks okay to me. > Yeah, it means xip in normal case, and subxip in recovery case. >> Furthermore, if the snapshot is taken during recovery, the xip array is >> empty, and we should check subxip array. How about changing "xip arrays" >> to "xip or subxip array"? >> > > I don't know if that is an improvement. I think we should stick to > your initial proposed change. Agreed. Let's focus on the initial proposed change. -- Regrads, Japin Li. ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.
Commits
-
Improve comments referring snapshot's subxip array.
- 8b5262fa0efd 16.0 landed