Re: log_min_messages per backend type
Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
From: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
To: "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>
Cc: "Andres Freund" <andres@anarazel.de>, "Alvaro Herrera"
<alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-07-31T16:22:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow log_min_messages to be set per process type
- 38e0190ced71 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Assign "backend" type earlier during process start-up
- 0c8e082fba8d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Use integer backend type when exec'ing a postmaster child
- f1cd34f95272 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Sort guc_parameters.dat alphabetically by name
- fce7c73fba4e 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Create a separate file listing backend types
- dbf8cfb4f02e 19 (unreleased) cited
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 at 11:19, "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2025, at 10:33 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >> Huh, the startup process is among the most crucial things to monitor? >> > > Good point. Fixed. > > After collecting some suggestions, I'm attaching a new patch contains the > following changes: > > - patch was rebased > - include Alvaro's patch (v2-0001) [1] as a basis for this patch > - add ioworker as new backend type > - add startup as new backend type per Andres suggestion > - small changes into documentation > >> I don't know what I think about the whole patch, but I do want to voice >> *strong* opposition to duplicating a list of all backend types into multiple >> places. It's already painfull enough to add a new backend type, without having >> to pointlessly go around and manually add a new backend type to mulltiple >> arrays that have completely predictable content. >> > > I'm including Alvaro's patch as is just to make the CF bot happy and to > illustrate how it would be if we adopt his solution to centralize the list of > backend types. I think Alvaro's proposal overcomes the objection [2], right? > If we set the log level for all backend types, I don't think a generic log level is necessary. -- Regards, Japin Li ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.