RE: Update comments in multixact.c
Yu Shi (Fujitsu) <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
From: "shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-01-18T10:02:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v1-0001-Update-comments-in-multixact.c.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v1-0001
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 6:04 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:33 AM shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com > <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > I noticed that commit 5212d447fa updated some comments in multixact.c > because > > SLRU truncation for multixacts is performed during VACUUM, instead of > > checkpoint. Should the following comments which mentioned checkpointer be > > changed, too? > > Yes, I think so. Thanks for your reply. Attach a patch which fixed them. Regards, Shi yu
Commits
-
Update more obsolete multixact.c comments.
- 8f8f11593258 16.0 landed
-
Update obsolete multixact.c comments.
- 5212d447fa53 16.0 cited