RE: doc patch: clarify the naming rule for injection_points

Dear Michael,

> > I also feel just converting lower case is not good. The point seems to locate in
> > the end-of-transaction callback and it accepts invalidation messages. Based on
> the
> > fact, how about "inval-process-invalidation-messages"?
> > 0002 did simple replacements of these words.
> 
> -	INJECTION_POINT("heap_update-before-pin");
> +	INJECTION_POINT("heap-update-before-pin");
> 
> The former name is better IMO.  heap_update() is the name of the
> function where the point is defined.
> 
> -	INJECTION_POINT("AtEOXact_Inval-with-transInvalInfo");
> +	INJECTION_POINT("inval-process-invalidation-messages");
> 
> This naming has been puzzling me, though, so a rename looks fit.  I am
> not sure that this is the best name that matches with this code path,
> as this lacks a reference regarding the end of a transaction.  Perhaps
> something like "end-transaction-process-inval" would be better?

Thanks for suggesting them. ISTM, you are correct. PSA updated version.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED