Horton

RE: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests

Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
To: 'Fujii Masao' <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, 'Peter Eisentraut' <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org'" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-06-12T03:23:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Dear Fujii-san,

> +1 to focusing on the 0001 patch.
> 
> Since this isn't a bug fix, I'm not sure back-patching is strictly necessary.
> That said, it does improve consistency and test coverage, e.g., by adding checks
> like help text length, so I'd be fine with back-patching if others see value in it.

Initially I thought this was helpful even for back branches, but it is not
100% needed.
No objections even if it is only applied to master - it can check new features in
future.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

Commits

  1. pgbench: Use standard option handling test routines