RE: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR
Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
To: 'Amit Kapila' <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Vitaly Davydov <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-07-09T11:42:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix random failure in 021_twophase.
- 0dcea330babd 18.0 landed
-
Allow altering of two_phase option of a SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1462aad2e447 18.0 landed
-
Doc: use true|false rather than on|off for "failover" option
- fa65a022db26 17.0 cited
-
Support an optional asynchronous commit mode, in which we don't flush WAL
- 4a78cdeb6b59 8.3.0 cited
Dear Amit, Thanks for giving comments! Here I wanted to reply one of comments. > What should be the behavior if one tries to set slot_name to NONE and > also tries to toggle two_pahse option? You mentioned like below case, right? ``` ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub SET (two_phase = false, slot_name = NONE); ``` For now, we accept such a command. The replication slot which previously specified is altered. As you know, this behavior is same as failover's one. > I feel both options together > don't makes sense because there is no use in changing two_phase for > some slot which we are disassociating the subscription from. The same > could be said for the failover option as well, so if we agree with > some different behavior here, we can follow the same for failover > option as well. While considering more, I started to think the combination of slot_name and two_phase should not be allowed. Even if both of them are altered at the same time, the *old* slot will be modified by the backend process. I feel this inconsistency should not be happened. In next patch, this check will be added. I also think failover option should be also fixed, but not touched here. Let's make the scope narrower. Best Regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED https://www.fujitsu.com/