RE: Support logical replication of DDLs

Wei Wang (Fujitsu) <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com>

From: "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com" <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com>
To: "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com" <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>, li jie <ggysxcq@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh.rs0541@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-03-09T02:26:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add a run_as_owner option to subscriptions.

  2. Refactor pgoutput_change().

  3. Print the correct aliases for DML target tables in ruleutils.

  4. Fix object identity string for transforms

  5. Add grantable MAINTAIN privilege and pg_maintain role.

  6. Get rid of recursion-marker values in enum AlterTableType

  7. Release cache tuple when no longer needed

  8. Empty search_path in logical replication apply worker and walsender.

  9. Refactor format_type APIs to be more modular

  10. Use wrappers of PG_DETOAST_DATUM_PACKED() more.

On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 18:17 PM Wang, Wei/王 威 <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 14:34 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Changes are in patch 1 and patch 2
> 
> Thanks for updating the patch set.
> 
> Here are some comments:

Here are some more comments for v-75-0002* patch:

1. In the function deparse_AlterRelation
+		if ((sub->address.objectId != relId &&
+			 sub->address.objectId != InvalidOid) &&
+			!(subcmd->subtype == AT_AddConstraint &&
+			  subcmd->recurse) &&
+			istable)
+			continue;
I think when we execute the command "ALTER TABLE ... CLUSTER ON" (subtype is
AT_ClusterOn), this command will be skipped for parsing. I think we need to
parse this command here.

I think we are skipping some needed parsing due to this check, such as [1].#1
and the AT_ClusterOn command mentioned above. After reading the thread, I think
the purpose of this check is to fix the bug in [2] (see the last point in [2]).
I think maybe we could modify this check to `continue` when
sub->address.objectId and relId are inconsistent and sub->address.objectId is a
child (inherited or partition) table. What do you think?

~~~

2. In the function deparse_CreateStmt
I think when we execute the following command:
    `CREATE TABLE tbl (a int GENERATED ALWAYS AS (1) STORED);`
the deparsed result is :
    `CREATE  TABLE  public.tbl (a pg_catalog.int4 STORAGE plain GENERATED ALWAYS AS 1 STORED);`
I think the parentheses around generation_expr(I mean `1`) are missing, which
would cause a syntax error.

~~~

3. In the function deparse_IndexStmt
I think we missed parsing of options [NULLS NOT DISTINCT] in the following
command:
```
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ... ON table_name ... NULLS NOT DISTINCT;
```
I think we could check this option via node->nulls_not_distinct.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OS3PR01MB6275FE40496DA47C0A3369289EB69%40OS3PR01MB6275.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
[2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAD30UJ25nTPiVc0RTnsVbhHSNrnoqoackf9%2B%2BNa%2BR-QN6dRkw%40mail.gmail.com

Regards,
Wang wei