RE: Support logical replication of DDLs
Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh.rs0541@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-06-07T02:59:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a run_as_owner option to subscriptions.
- 482675987bcd 16.0 cited
-
Refactor pgoutput_change().
- da324d6cd45b 16.0 cited
-
Print the correct aliases for DML target tables in ruleutils.
- df931e9ab35b 11.20 landed
- c8a5f1685fb7 15.3 landed
- 4efb4f0d4878 13.11 landed
- 3dd287c14fac 12.15 landed
- 393430f57544 16.0 landed
- 14345f3c6a7b 14.8 landed
-
Fix object identity string for transforms
- 9a312562314a 16.0 landed
-
Add grantable MAINTAIN privilege and pg_maintain role.
- 60684dd834a2 16.0 cited
-
Get rid of recursion-marker values in enum AlterTableType
- 840ff5f451cd 16.0 cited
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 cited
-
Empty search_path in logical replication apply worker and walsender.
- 11da97024abb 14.0 cited
-
Refactor format_type APIs to be more modular
- a26116c6cbf4 11.0 cited
-
Use wrappers of PG_DETOAST_DATUM_PACKED() more.
- 3a0d473192b2 10.0 cited
Attachments
- v7-0002-Support-DDL-replication.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v7-0002
- v7-0003-support-CREATE-TABLE-A-ELECT-INTO.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v7-0003
- v7-0001-Functions-to-deparse-DDL-commands.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v7-0001
On Friday, June 3, 2022 7:16 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 5:44 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > The main idea of replicating the CREATE TABLE AS is that we deprase > > the CREATE TABLE AS into a simple CREATE TABLE(without subquery) > > command and WAL log it after creating the table and before writing > > data into the table and replicate the incoming writes later as normal > > INSERTs. In this apporach, we don't execute the subquery on subscriber > > so that don't need to make sure all the objects referenced in the > > subquery also exists in subscriber. And This approach works for all > > kind of commands(e.g. CRAETE TABLE AS [SELECT][EXECUTE][VALUES]) > > > > One problem of this approach is that we cannot use the current trigger > > to deparse or WAL log the CREATE TABLE. Because none of the even > > trigger is fired after creating the table and before inserting the > > data. To solve this, one idea is that we could directly add some code > > at the end of create_ctas_internal() to deparse and WAL log it. > > Moreover, we could even introduce a new type of event > > trigger(table_create) which would be fired at the expected timing so > > that we can use the trigger function to deparse and WAL log. I am not > > sure which way is better. > > > > I am also not able to think of a better way to replicate CREATE TABLE AS/SELECT > INTO other than to use a new type of event trigger. I think it is better to discuss > this new type of event trigger in a separate thread with the use case of DDL > replication unless we have a better idea to achieve this. > > Few comments: > =============== > 1. Why not capture the CREATE TABLE/CREATE TABLE AS ... command with > EventTriggerCollectSimpleCommand instead of using > EventTriggerCreateTableStart? After thinking more, I remove this part as it seems enough for the new type trigger to only catch the CTAS and SELECT INTO. > 2. > + /* > + * Use PG_TRY to ensure parsetree is reset even when one trigger > + * fails. (This is perhaps not necessary, as the currentState variable > + will > + * be removed shortly by our caller, but it seems better to play safe.) > + */ old_parsetree = > + currentEventTriggerState->currentCommand->parsetree; > + currentEventTriggerState->currentCommand->d.simple.address = address; > + currentEventTriggerState->currentCommand->parsetree = parsetree; > > Instead of doing this can't we use the parsetree stored in trigdata to deparse > the statement? We need to use the real createstmt which contains the actual column info. But I agree It looks hacky and I adjusted this part in the patch. > 3. Is there a reason to invoke the trigger after defining the relation instead of > doing it before similar to table_rewrite trigger (EventTriggerTableRewrite). To deparse the createstmt we need to access the catalog info about the newly created table, so I invoke this after defining table. > 4. It should be published for all tables publication similar to 'create table' Agreed. > 5. The new code in CreatePublication looks quite haphazard, can we improve it > by moving it into separate functions? Changed. Thanks for the comments. Here is the new version POC patch set for DDL replication. For V7-0002, I tried to improve the code in publicationcmds.c by introducing a common function to create the event trigger which can avoid some duplicate code. Besides, I merged Ajin's DROP CASCADE patch into it. Also adjusted some other code style. For V7-0003, I changed the new type trigger to only catch the CREATE TABLE AS/SELECT INTO. And rename it to "table_init_write" trigger which seems consistent for its usage. I kept the function EventTriggerTableInitWriteStart/End as we need these to store the original parsetree which is needed to filter the tagname(We need to use the tag in original parsetree to judge which command should fire the event trigger, see function EventTriggerCommonSetup()). Besides, I also adjusted code try to make it look less hacky. Best regards, Hou zj