RE: row filtering for logical replication
Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
Attachments
- v56-0001-Row-filter-for-logical-replication.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v56-0001
- v56-0004-refactor-row-filter-transformation.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v56-0004
- v56-0002-Row-filter-updates-based-on-old-new-tuples.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v56-0002
- v56-0003-Row-filter-tab-auto-complete-and-pgdump.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v56-0003
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 11:16 AM Tang, Haiying <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 9:16 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thur, Dec 23, 2021 4:28 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Here is the v54* patch set:
> >
> > Attach the v55 patch set which add the following testcases in 0003 patch.
> > 1. Added a test to cover the case where TOASTed values are not included in the
> > new tuple. Suggested by Euler[1].
> >
> > Note: this test is temporarily commented because it would fail without
> > applying another bug fix patch in another thread[2] which log the
> detoasted
> > value in old value. I have verified locally that the test pass after
> > applying the bug fix patch[2].
> >
> > 2. Add a test to cover the case that transform the UPDATE into INSERT.
> Provided
> > by Tang.
> >
>
> Thanks for updating the patches.
>
> A few comments:
>
> 1) v55-0001
>
> -/*
> - * Gets the relations based on the publication partition option for a specified
> - * relation.
> - */
> List *
> GetPubPartitionOptionRelations(List *result, PublicationPartOpt pub_partopt,
> Oid relid)
>
> Do we need this change?
Added the comment back.
> 2) v55-0002
> * Multiple ExprState entries might be used if there are multiple
> * publications for a single table. Different publication actions don't
> * allow multiple expressions to always be combined into one, so there is
> - * one ExprSTate per publication action. Only 3 publication actions are
> + * one ExprState per publication action. Only 3 publication actions
> +are
> * used for row filtering ("insert", "update", "delete"). The exprstate
> * array is indexed by ReorderBufferChangeType.
> */
>
> I think this change can be merged into 0001 patch.
Merged.
> 3) v55-0002
> +static bool pgoutput_row_filter_update_check(enum
> ReorderBufferChangeType changetype, Relation relation,
> +
> HeapTuple oldtuple, HeapTuple newtuple,
> +
> RelationSyncEntry *entry, ReorderBufferChangeType *action);
>
> Do we need parameter changetype here? I think it could only be
> REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_UPDATE.
I didn't change this, I think it might be better to wait for Ajin's opinion.
Attach the v56 patch set which address above comments and comments(1. 2.) from [1]
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OS3PR01MB62756D18BA0FA969D5255E369E459%40OS3PR01MB6275.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Best regards,
Hou zj