RE: Support logical replication of DDLs

Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>

From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
To: "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com" <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>, li jie <ggysxcq@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh.rs0541@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-03-09T09:58:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add a run_as_owner option to subscriptions.

  2. Refactor pgoutput_change().

  3. Print the correct aliases for DML target tables in ruleutils.

  4. Fix object identity string for transforms

  5. Add grantable MAINTAIN privilege and pg_maintain role.

  6. Get rid of recursion-marker values in enum AlterTableType

  7. Release cache tuple when no longer needed

  8. Empty search_path in logical replication apply worker and walsender.

  9. Refactor format_type APIs to be more modular

  10. Use wrappers of PG_DETOAST_DATUM_PACKED() more.

Attachments

On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 18:17 PM Wang, Wei/王 威 <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 14:34 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Changes are in patch 1 and patch 2
> 
> Thanks for updating the patch set.
> 
> Here are some comments:

Thanks for your comments.

> For v-75-0002* patch.
> 1. In the function deparse_AlterRelation.
> +		if ((sub->address.objectId != relId &&
> +			 sub->address.objectId != InvalidOid) &&
> +			!(subcmd->subtype == AT_AddConstraint &&
> +			  subcmd->recurse) &&
> +			istable)
> +			continue;
> 
> I think when we execute the command "ALTER TABLE ... ADD (index)" 
> (subtype is AT_AddIndexConstraint or AT_AddIndex), this command will 
> be skipped for parsing.
> I think we need to parse both types of commands here.

Fixed.

> ~~~
> 
> 3. In the function deparse_CreateTrigStmt
> +		tgargs = DatumGetByteaP(fastgetattr(trigTup,
> +
> 	Anum_pg_trigger_tgargs,
> +
> 	RelationGetDescr(pg_trigger),
> +
> 	&isnull));
> +		if (isnull)
> +			elog(ERROR, "null tgargs for trigger \"%s\"",
> +				 NameStr(trigForm->tgname));
> +		argstr = (char *) VARDATA(tgargs);
> +		lentgargs = VARSIZE_ANY_EXHDR(tgargs);
> a.
> I think it might be better to invoke the function DatumGetByteaP after 
> checking the flag "isnull". Because if "isnull" is true, I think an 
> unexpected pointer
> ((NULL)->va_header) will be used when invoking macro VARATT_IS_4B_U.

Fixed.

> b.
> Since commit 3a0d473 recommends using macro DatumGetByteaPP instead of 
> DatumGetByteaP, and the function pg_get_triggerdef_worker also uses 
> macro DatumGetByteaPP, I think it might be better to use DatumGetByteaPP here.

Changed.

> ~~~
> 
> 4. In the function deparse_CreateTrigStmt
> +	append_object_object(ret, "EXECUTE PROCEDURE %{function}s",
> tmp_obj);
> 
> Since the use of the keyword "PROCEDURE" is historical, I think it 
> might be better to use "FUNCTION".

Changed.

> ===
> For v-75-0004* patch.
> 5. File src/test/modules/test_ddl_deparse_regress/README.md
> +1. Test that the generated JSON blob is expected using SQL tests.
> +2. Test that the re-formed DDL command is expected using SQL tests.
> +3. Test	that the re-formed DDL command has the same effect as the original
> command
> +   by comparing	the results of pg_dump,	using the SQL tests in 1
> and 2.
> +4. Test	that new DDL syntax is handled by the DDL deparser by capturing and
> deparing
> +   DDL commands	ran by pg_regress.
> 
> Inconsistent spacing:
> \t -> blank space

Changed.

Attach the new patch set which addressed above comments and comments from [1].
0001,0002,0003,0004 patch has been updated in this version.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OS3PR01MB62752246D2A718126825A1809EB59%40OS3PR01MB6275.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com

Best Regards,
Hou zj