RE: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade

Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
To: 'shveta malik' <shveta.malik@gmail.com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-07-08T06:21:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dear Shveta,

> For this reason, my inclination is to revert to the previous
> implementation, where we compare old_cluster.nsubs with
> max_active_replication_origins. But I'd like to hear what others think
> before we make this change.

But if origin created by users (or any extensions) have already been tracking the
Remote_lsn, they should be taken into account. If there are three enabled
subscriptions, two active user-created origins but the max_active_origin is set
to three on the new node, the upgrading should fail.
 
I prefer to preserve the current behavior of the patch, which compares
max_active_origin and total number of origins. It might cause the false-positive,
but even now it can happen. E.g., if there was a subscription which has never
been enabled.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Introduce replication progress tracking infrastructure.