RE: ECPG: inconsistent behavior with the document in “GET/SET DESCRIPTOR.”
Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
To: 'Fujii Masao' <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: "Masashi Kamura (Fujitsu)" <kamura.masashi@fujitsu.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, lakshmi <lakshmigcdac@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-05-29T03:44:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dear Fujii-san, > > Overall: The author found the case pre-compilation could succeed but the actual > > compilation would fail, with SET/GET DESCRIPTOR. This patch tries to detect > the > > pre-compilation phase and raise a failure. > > The patch looks good to me. > Barring any objections, I'm thinking to commit it. Thanks! > > > Based on the SQL standard/other > > DBMSs/history, it's not meaningful to allow the statement. > > This does not contain tests because we cannot compile such a test program in > the > > first place. > > I'm not sure this case warrants regression tests, but if we need them, > the attached patch adds them. Oh, I didn't recognized that we had TAP tests to detect error/warnings by the pre compiler. I do not have strong opinions for it. Best regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED